Phil and I woke up early this morning to run to Wal-Mart and buy a bunch of stuff we still needed for the Christmas Party. When we finished that, we headed to the NEW AMC Castleton Theatre (which will NEVER replace Castleton Arts) to see what the new theatre was like, and to catch "National Treasure: Book of Secrets" in DIGITAL!!!
I was over playing poker WAY TOO LATE at Troy's last night, and had no chance of catching a screening last night, but this film was HIGH on my priority list this year, and probably #1 at Christmas.
First, the theatre LOOKS beautful! Nice high lobby ceiling, some nice comfortable couches and chairs in one part of the lobby. Down the hallways they have some nice murals of various directors - showing the director on a set, giving his name and the name of the movie. Scorsese, Spieldberg, and Lee are the three I remember off the top of my head. The concession stand has BEAUTIFUL digital marquees - but, they aren't new, Landmark has had the exact same ones since they opened. But, it still looks better than regular concession marquees. I was disappointed that they don't offer pizzas - like Greenwood - since I hadn't had lunch, and was looking for something to eat at the theatre that would fill me up.
The presentation was very good. Nice LARGE screen. PERFECT picture. The digital sure does look amazing. The only problem with the presentation was the SEVEN trailers before the film (including "Speed Racer", which doesn't look as good as I thought it would, but I do still want to see it...), followed by a 7 or 8 minute short CARTOON starring Goofy!!! Before THIS FILM!?!?!? Seriously? Put that in front of another animated movie, or a true kids film. But, as an adult, don't ruin "National Treasure" for me with a long cartoon. It was a good and funny cartoon, I laughed a lot, but I would have preferred to watch it at home, when I was watching other animated shorts with Goofy in them! Anyways, the start time was 12:00pm, it was 12:25pm before The Disney Logo actually hit the screen to signify the start of the film.
The chairs SUCK. That's really the only true complaint I have about the theatre. It was SO UNCOMFORTABLE!!! It felt like I was sitting on a board the entire time, I constantly found myself shifting and trying to get comfortable. It never happened. I hope after this busy holiday season, and lots of people coming in, that they might lose some of their stiffness and become a little more enjoyable to sit in. Granted, I'll probably only go there and pay their fee for movies that I really want to see in Digital. Why pay for it, when I can still see it other places for free? But, there will be some things that I have to see in Digital. Just like there are some movies that I have to own on HD-DVD.
When we went to the theatre, I told Phil this: "I just don't want it to suck. I can handle it not being as good as the original, I just don't want the film to be complete crap."
It's not as good as the original.
But, it's NOT crap either.
So, I was pleasantly surprised with the film.
I laughed a lot. I still enjoy Riley and his side-kick comments.
The story is a little weak, but not really bad. It's just not as big and built up as the original one was. There's not as many clues and mysteries to solve. And there's not as much of a sense of danger as in the original. I LOVE Ed Harris and the character he plays. He fits in well, but at times did just remind me of playing a Sean Bean clone. While his intentions and motivations are different, he pursues Nic Cage and follows him very much the same. There's really no big plot twist in this one, not that there really was one in the first film, but when they get to the bottom of the pit and convince Sean Bean and his men that they need to go to Boston, that was kind of a good "pull the wool over their eyes" moment. Not one of those this time. It's much more simple, and much more "straight-lined" in their pursuit of things.
Bruce Greenwood plays the President! (You STILL haven't watched "Nowhere Man", have you??? SHAME ON YOU!!! What is your problem???) I wish he was in more of the film, but I enjoyed what he did. It's funny, I've loved this dude since 1994, and it seems like every couple of months I am mentioning his name in something new (and, then mentioning "Nowhere Man" which IS AVAILABLE ON DVD!!!). I'm very, very glad to see him getting this much work. He deserves it.
They left it open for a sequel. I recently read where Nic Cage wants to take the next film (if they make one), but I don't know if the "opening" they left in the film would actually take him to where he said he wanted to go. Either way, IF/WHEN the make the third one, I'll be interested to watch it too.
Friday, December 21, 2007
Tuesday, December 18, 2007
TSO This Year
Amazing.
Probably more amazing than last year.
It's obviously fresher in my mind, but I do think they made some serious improvements.
The first hour and a half was the same as last year - music-wise. They went through the story from "Christmas Eve and Other Stories", which the entire album is a story about an Angel coming down to earth on Christmas Eve and visiting different places, and observing people and how they spend their holiday. The black gentleman who was the narrator (I don't know if it was the same one as last year) was AMAZING. The guy from last year was too, and they might be the same person.
I liked the set up of the lights better this year. It's hard to explain, in a way the vertical pillars had lights attached to them that came down diagonally and sort of resembled Tree branches. The over head light contraption was very similar to last year's in that it was (I think) 10 separate square light fixtures that moved basically 270-degrees in every direction.
The pyrotechnics were VERY increased from last year. Including much more fireworks during the regular show, and some pretty huge burst of flames that I could feel the heat from in me seat. And in addition to the rising stage in the middle of the audience, they also had a rising platform that had three "torches" on it, that they used. This year, the rising platform for the performers was directly in front of our seats (we were three rows up off the floor, directly in front of the stage) so we got to see the guitarist and violinist up close - following their rising stage performance, they continued playing their instruments as they walked up and down the aisles at Conseco - it was AWESOME. They would stop here and there to put on an extra display. The rising stage was also used by the lead singer in "Queen of the Winter Night" - which it is AMAZING what she can make her voice do.
This year they had dueling guitarists. Which was pretty cool. And luckily, they still did the dueling pianos, at one point including "Greensleeves" (which I don't know if Vince Guaraldi wrote or not, but I do know he has played the song on a Peanuts album) and the room (once again) ERUPTED (myself more than anyone) when they broke out with "Linus and Lucy" and used it as a segue into their Finale Medley. Amazing, amazing.
There were lasers.
There was snow.
It was amazing. It's a show that I am sad only happens once a year, here in town. I would go much more often, if I could. It AMAZES me what these people do with their hands, and the music that is made on their instruments. The way these guys play their guitars, and the way they blend guitars, strings, pianos, etc... all together to make these amazing sounds, just blows my mind. And then you couple that with their AMAZING visual light shows at the concert - it's just phenomenal.
I was able to track down a couple of videos on YouTube. This first one is cool because it begins with "Linus and Lucy" and then allows you to hear the different songs they strung together for their finale. it ROCKED!!! ENJOY:
This video is REALLY GOOD to show you the overhead lights, and how they moved:
This video gives you a good look at the "snow" coming down, as well as the video curtains that were on each side of the stage and going across the top:
Finally, this video just gives you a good overall feeling for how the stage looked, and all of the different lights that were used.
The best place to learn more about TSO is THEIR PAGE ON WIKIPEDIA.
Probably more amazing than last year.
It's obviously fresher in my mind, but I do think they made some serious improvements.
The first hour and a half was the same as last year - music-wise. They went through the story from "Christmas Eve and Other Stories", which the entire album is a story about an Angel coming down to earth on Christmas Eve and visiting different places, and observing people and how they spend their holiday. The black gentleman who was the narrator (I don't know if it was the same one as last year) was AMAZING. The guy from last year was too, and they might be the same person.
I liked the set up of the lights better this year. It's hard to explain, in a way the vertical pillars had lights attached to them that came down diagonally and sort of resembled Tree branches. The over head light contraption was very similar to last year's in that it was (I think) 10 separate square light fixtures that moved basically 270-degrees in every direction.
The pyrotechnics were VERY increased from last year. Including much more fireworks during the regular show, and some pretty huge burst of flames that I could feel the heat from in me seat. And in addition to the rising stage in the middle of the audience, they also had a rising platform that had three "torches" on it, that they used. This year, the rising platform for the performers was directly in front of our seats (we were three rows up off the floor, directly in front of the stage) so we got to see the guitarist and violinist up close - following their rising stage performance, they continued playing their instruments as they walked up and down the aisles at Conseco - it was AWESOME. They would stop here and there to put on an extra display. The rising stage was also used by the lead singer in "Queen of the Winter Night" - which it is AMAZING what she can make her voice do.
This year they had dueling guitarists. Which was pretty cool. And luckily, they still did the dueling pianos, at one point including "Greensleeves" (which I don't know if Vince Guaraldi wrote or not, but I do know he has played the song on a Peanuts album) and the room (once again) ERUPTED (myself more than anyone) when they broke out with "Linus and Lucy" and used it as a segue into their Finale Medley. Amazing, amazing.
There were lasers.
There was snow.
It was amazing. It's a show that I am sad only happens once a year, here in town. I would go much more often, if I could. It AMAZES me what these people do with their hands, and the music that is made on their instruments. The way these guys play their guitars, and the way they blend guitars, strings, pianos, etc... all together to make these amazing sounds, just blows my mind. And then you couple that with their AMAZING visual light shows at the concert - it's just phenomenal.
I was able to track down a couple of videos on YouTube. This first one is cool because it begins with "Linus and Lucy" and then allows you to hear the different songs they strung together for their finale. it ROCKED!!! ENJOY:
This video is REALLY GOOD to show you the overhead lights, and how they moved:
This video gives you a good look at the "snow" coming down, as well as the video curtains that were on each side of the stage and going across the top:
Finally, this video just gives you a good overall feeling for how the stage looked, and all of the different lights that were used.
The best place to learn more about TSO is THEIR PAGE ON WIKIPEDIA.
Tuesday, September 11, 2007
Has It Really Been Six Years?
September 11th, 2001.
It's like the JFK moment of my generation.
I still remember the day very well.
Now, it's six years later. It's weird to think about.
Last summer, after I watched "World Trade Center", I wrote a long blog about the day.
You can READ IT HERE.
Light a candle tonight.
It's like the JFK moment of my generation.
I still remember the day very well.
Now, it's six years later. It's weird to think about.
Last summer, after I watched "World Trade Center", I wrote a long blog about the day.
You can READ IT HERE.
Light a candle tonight.
Thursday, September 06, 2007
"Shoot 'Em Up" Talk
The flick is AWESOME.
It's NOT GOOD, but it is AWESOME.
There's only one way it would have been better:
If Justin Rachal, Jason Maier, Dave Maier, and Michael Maier were in the auditorium with me. Because I would LOVE to have heard their laughs at how outrageous and ridiculous this entire film was. WOW!
It knocked off "Crank" as the most insane film that I have seen in a long time. GREAT! I doubt I'll ever watch it again - unless its with one of those aforementioned individuals.
Go see it, with the guys - because you'll laugh your tail off. It doesn't really appeal to chicks, I don't think?
It's NOT GOOD, but it is AWESOME.
There's only one way it would have been better:
If Justin Rachal, Jason Maier, Dave Maier, and Michael Maier were in the auditorium with me. Because I would LOVE to have heard their laughs at how outrageous and ridiculous this entire film was. WOW!
It knocked off "Crank" as the most insane film that I have seen in a long time. GREAT! I doubt I'll ever watch it again - unless its with one of those aforementioned individuals.
Go see it, with the guys - because you'll laugh your tail off. It doesn't really appeal to chicks, I don't think?
Friday, August 31, 2007
The New "Halloween"
As its own film, I liked Rob Zombie's "Halloween".
What's the same?
Michael Myers.
Killing.
Family.
Mental Institution.
Character names.
And the same basic storyline and structure.
What's different?
EVERYTHING ELSE.
On it's own, without taking into account the original, this is a well made film with a good story. Rob Zombie does an amazing job telling the story and has really good camera work with his DP.
Overall, I still love the original - and this is not as good of an overall film.
Will I own it? Sure.
Will I watch it again? Sure.
Is it freaky and generally scarier than the original? Yes.
Zombie's version attempts to justify the Michael Myers character. It's the one thing that I DO NOT like about this film. The original opens with Michael and him killing. It's a beautiful shot that doesn't cut (due to some good editing, a la "Rope"). This version spends the first 20 minutes of the film giving you the back story to Michael Myers and explains the circumstances that lead him to become the killer he is. I don't like this. It removes all of the mystery behind this character. And if the new Dr. Loomis was any good, he could connect the dots and realize he's a troubled kids from a screwed up family and life.
In the original, Michael parents arrive at home wearing a nice suit and a pretty dress. He came from a good family - and pure evil turned him into the killer he was. Instead, Zombie felt that he needed to justify the means that created Michael Myers. While it involves some good scenes, and amazing acting, it ruins the overall mystique of the character.
Aside from that fact, it is troublesome to watch the decline of this child. It's brutal and wicked how we watch him break down on screen.
This carries over into the adult Michael Myers. Zombie trades the long exposition of developing young Michael, by removing the majority of the character development between Laurie and her friends, and he almost completely removes the "stalker" aspect of the original film - which happened during the thirty minutes of character development. Once we see Laurie, it's not long before she's babysitting. And it's not long before people start to die - in many graphic ways.
While it follows the original jist, and even borrows some original dialogue, it's unique enough.
The flick is worth watching, but if you love the original as much as I do - it's going to be difficult for you to give this version proper credit. It is a poor remake, but it is not a bad film. It's very much more action packed and modern than the original. It's got some very suspenseful scenes. For what it was, I really enjoyed it.
Question for people after they've seen it: WHAT time period does this film take place?
We all decided that it was modern, but done up very retro - to the point that we almost believe it was in the past. Thoughts?
What's the same?
Michael Myers.
Killing.
Family.
Mental Institution.
Character names.
And the same basic storyline and structure.
What's different?
EVERYTHING ELSE.
On it's own, without taking into account the original, this is a well made film with a good story. Rob Zombie does an amazing job telling the story and has really good camera work with his DP.
Overall, I still love the original - and this is not as good of an overall film.
Will I own it? Sure.
Will I watch it again? Sure.
Is it freaky and generally scarier than the original? Yes.
Zombie's version attempts to justify the Michael Myers character. It's the one thing that I DO NOT like about this film. The original opens with Michael and him killing. It's a beautiful shot that doesn't cut (due to some good editing, a la "Rope"). This version spends the first 20 minutes of the film giving you the back story to Michael Myers and explains the circumstances that lead him to become the killer he is. I don't like this. It removes all of the mystery behind this character. And if the new Dr. Loomis was any good, he could connect the dots and realize he's a troubled kids from a screwed up family and life.
In the original, Michael parents arrive at home wearing a nice suit and a pretty dress. He came from a good family - and pure evil turned him into the killer he was. Instead, Zombie felt that he needed to justify the means that created Michael Myers. While it involves some good scenes, and amazing acting, it ruins the overall mystique of the character.
Aside from that fact, it is troublesome to watch the decline of this child. It's brutal and wicked how we watch him break down on screen.
This carries over into the adult Michael Myers. Zombie trades the long exposition of developing young Michael, by removing the majority of the character development between Laurie and her friends, and he almost completely removes the "stalker" aspect of the original film - which happened during the thirty minutes of character development. Once we see Laurie, it's not long before she's babysitting. And it's not long before people start to die - in many graphic ways.
While it follows the original jist, and even borrows some original dialogue, it's unique enough.
The flick is worth watching, but if you love the original as much as I do - it's going to be difficult for you to give this version proper credit. It is a poor remake, but it is not a bad film. It's very much more action packed and modern than the original. It's got some very suspenseful scenes. For what it was, I really enjoyed it.
Question for people after they've seen it: WHAT time period does this film take place?
We all decided that it was modern, but done up very retro - to the point that we almost believe it was in the past. Thoughts?
Wednesday, July 11, 2007
"Order of the Phoenix" Talk
First, if you go see the flick, there is a chance you'll see THIS PREVIEW.
Sadly, it's NOT what I wanted it to be. For a quick few seconds, I almost thought I was watching a preview for "Bill & Ted 3" - which would have ROCKED MY WORLD. And made me wonder how I didn't already know about it. Anyways, the preview is funny, but I wish my dreams were coming true, instead of that other film.
Film Five.
It's like every other "Harry Potter" film, and exactly what I expected: A mysterious story, mention of "He Who Shall Not Be Named" throughout, and finally some quick action at the end, and a short resolution. It's a formula, and it works for them, and the films are enjoyable.
Now, I'm not a huge fan of the book series, I've never read one page of any book, and I'm not getting in line for the July 21st release of the FINAL book. I'm just a fan of the films. I've got a number of friends who fill me in on the missing storylines and characters, and I feel like I've got a fairly good Harry Potter knowledge, for someone who has never touched the books.
I'm a fan of the films, and the visuals, and how the stories translate to the big screen. I saw the first one to see what the hype was about, and I like it. And I've continued to like them as the series has gone on. I don't find them boring, or dumb, and while this film was NOT as much fun as "Transformers", it was still exactly what I wanted, what I looked for, and what I expected. So, I can't say there was anything bad about the story, or the film.
Although, I'll be honest that the opening of the film wasn't a good taste, at first. While it looked cinematically beautiful, some of the editing, quick cutting, and hand-held camera work didn't feel like it fit into the Harry Potter Film Universe, it annoyed me much in the same away as Alfanso Cuaron's "Prisoner of Azkaban" film felt, with the contastant "Iris Close/Iris Open" to transition between scenes - I REALLY disliked that part of the film, despite it being an enjoyable storyline, the editing of the film makes it the hardest of them all to watch. Chris Columbus did an amazing job with the first two films, both style-wise and visually, that I don't think the last three have been up the bar he set. With that said, "The Order of the Phoenix" was EXACTLY what I expected and wanted, and I enjoyed it.
I hope you do too.
On a completely unrelated note, it looks like Warner Brothers is copying themselves with the "Superman" sequel being titled "Man of Steel" - it's the EXACT SAME concept they went with for the Batman sequel being called "The Dark Knight". The sequels are just being titled with the character's nicknames. Clever one WB, very clever.
So, in "The Order of the Phoenix", there are many exterior shots of London at the beginning and the end. Toss in Alan Rickman and Emma Thompson, and WHAT MOVIE do you think I am in the mood to watch when I get home? Yep, I popped in "Love Actually". Big surprise?
UPDATE: My former boss, Helene, gets a mention in THIS ARTICLE from Indy Star. It's always fun to see the names of people I know. Maybe I will have to check this out in IMAX sometime.
Sadly, it's NOT what I wanted it to be. For a quick few seconds, I almost thought I was watching a preview for "Bill & Ted 3" - which would have ROCKED MY WORLD. And made me wonder how I didn't already know about it. Anyways, the preview is funny, but I wish my dreams were coming true, instead of that other film.
Film Five.
It's like every other "Harry Potter" film, and exactly what I expected: A mysterious story, mention of "He Who Shall Not Be Named" throughout, and finally some quick action at the end, and a short resolution. It's a formula, and it works for them, and the films are enjoyable.
Now, I'm not a huge fan of the book series, I've never read one page of any book, and I'm not getting in line for the July 21st release of the FINAL book. I'm just a fan of the films. I've got a number of friends who fill me in on the missing storylines and characters, and I feel like I've got a fairly good Harry Potter knowledge, for someone who has never touched the books.
I'm a fan of the films, and the visuals, and how the stories translate to the big screen. I saw the first one to see what the hype was about, and I like it. And I've continued to like them as the series has gone on. I don't find them boring, or dumb, and while this film was NOT as much fun as "Transformers", it was still exactly what I wanted, what I looked for, and what I expected. So, I can't say there was anything bad about the story, or the film.
Although, I'll be honest that the opening of the film wasn't a good taste, at first. While it looked cinematically beautiful, some of the editing, quick cutting, and hand-held camera work didn't feel like it fit into the Harry Potter Film Universe, it annoyed me much in the same away as Alfanso Cuaron's "Prisoner of Azkaban" film felt, with the contastant "Iris Close/Iris Open" to transition between scenes - I REALLY disliked that part of the film, despite it being an enjoyable storyline, the editing of the film makes it the hardest of them all to watch. Chris Columbus did an amazing job with the first two films, both style-wise and visually, that I don't think the last three have been up the bar he set. With that said, "The Order of the Phoenix" was EXACTLY what I expected and wanted, and I enjoyed it.
I hope you do too.
On a completely unrelated note, it looks like Warner Brothers is copying themselves with the "Superman" sequel being titled "Man of Steel" - it's the EXACT SAME concept they went with for the Batman sequel being called "The Dark Knight". The sequels are just being titled with the character's nicknames. Clever one WB, very clever.
So, in "The Order of the Phoenix", there are many exterior shots of London at the beginning and the end. Toss in Alan Rickman and Emma Thompson, and WHAT MOVIE do you think I am in the mood to watch when I get home? Yep, I popped in "Love Actually". Big surprise?
UPDATE: My former boss, Helene, gets a mention in THIS ARTICLE from Indy Star. It's always fun to see the names of people I know. Maybe I will have to check this out in IMAX sometime.
Friday, May 25, 2007
"Pirates 3" Review
Um... I don't think I watched the same film that Phil and Justin told me was good. The film that Justin gave 4 out of 5 stars...?
Well, my first problem was going to see the film at Clearwater. The seats there are good for about 90 minutes, then they SUCK. It's hard to believe that back in the "Good Old Days" (when Dave Maier was my manager) that I used to watch HUNDREDS of films at that theatre. I don't know how I survived... Oh yeah, I was young and dumb and didn't know what comfortable theatre seats really were.
Anyways. Can a film be any more filled with pointless crap? Within the past two weeks I've watched the first two films to get my mind refreshed. They both run around 2 hours and 20 minutes. Then comes this film, which runs about 3 hours. The sad part is that there is only about 100 minutes of good story. There was SO MUCH POINTLESS CRAP thrown into this movie that makes it drag on and on and on and on, etc...
Next, I'm SO BORED with the betrayal after betrayal after betrayal. I'm going to betray you, because you've betrayed me, and you are betraying me again, and so now I'm going to team up with my enemy, but y real goal is to betray them, but then after that I am going to betray you, but wait, you've betrayed me two more times since I began betraying this betrayer. It's RIDICULOUS!!! I'm tired of it. Move on, and get a better plot device. JEEZ!!!
And I haven't hated the "falling action" of a story since "Return of the King". I was seriously wondering IF THE FILM WOULD EVER END!!! Drag on, drag on, drag on, leave it open for five more sequels, drag on, drag on, drag on... BLAH. GET OVER!!!
If I wasn't in a packed auditorium, I probably would have fallen asleep. Sadly, with so many people so close around me, I can't lay my head down and sleep - I wish I would have.
The action scenes were fun to watch. Keira was great to look at. Jack was overly annoying. Keith Richards' cameo was entertaining. Chow Yun-Fat was held back from being truly awesome - like EVERY OTHER MOVIE HE IS IN. Seriously, I can't think of another actor that get screwed over more. It would be like putting Vin Deisel in a movie, making him looks awesome, then having DJ Qualls beat him up. WHAT!?!?!? Seriously, one day I hope someone actually gives him a good role.
Oh, and I was disappointed I didn't get to see the teaser trailer for "National Treasure 2". Justin described it to me today, and it sounded really cool. I can't find it on the 'net yet. (EDIT: The trailer is available at Yahoo! Movies and it looks REALLY COOL!!!)
I'm sure this film is going to a billion dollars this weekend (I'm exaggerating). And I'm sure lots of people are going to disagree with me. I know both Justin and Phil told me today that they liked it. So, I'm sure Jason will too - since we never ever agree on films. I did get to see the "Transformers" trailer again, so that made me happy - that's the next film I am DYING to see. I am SO PUMPED UP for that film!!!
Well, my first problem was going to see the film at Clearwater. The seats there are good for about 90 minutes, then they SUCK. It's hard to believe that back in the "Good Old Days" (when Dave Maier was my manager) that I used to watch HUNDREDS of films at that theatre. I don't know how I survived... Oh yeah, I was young and dumb and didn't know what comfortable theatre seats really were.
Anyways. Can a film be any more filled with pointless crap? Within the past two weeks I've watched the first two films to get my mind refreshed. They both run around 2 hours and 20 minutes. Then comes this film, which runs about 3 hours. The sad part is that there is only about 100 minutes of good story. There was SO MUCH POINTLESS CRAP thrown into this movie that makes it drag on and on and on and on, etc...
Next, I'm SO BORED with the betrayal after betrayal after betrayal. I'm going to betray you, because you've betrayed me, and you are betraying me again, and so now I'm going to team up with my enemy, but y real goal is to betray them, but then after that I am going to betray you, but wait, you've betrayed me two more times since I began betraying this betrayer. It's RIDICULOUS!!! I'm tired of it. Move on, and get a better plot device. JEEZ!!!
And I haven't hated the "falling action" of a story since "Return of the King". I was seriously wondering IF THE FILM WOULD EVER END!!! Drag on, drag on, drag on, leave it open for five more sequels, drag on, drag on, drag on... BLAH. GET OVER!!!
If I wasn't in a packed auditorium, I probably would have fallen asleep. Sadly, with so many people so close around me, I can't lay my head down and sleep - I wish I would have.
The action scenes were fun to watch. Keira was great to look at. Jack was overly annoying. Keith Richards' cameo was entertaining. Chow Yun-Fat was held back from being truly awesome - like EVERY OTHER MOVIE HE IS IN. Seriously, I can't think of another actor that get screwed over more. It would be like putting Vin Deisel in a movie, making him looks awesome, then having DJ Qualls beat him up. WHAT!?!?!? Seriously, one day I hope someone actually gives him a good role.
Oh, and I was disappointed I didn't get to see the teaser trailer for "National Treasure 2". Justin described it to me today, and it sounded really cool. I can't find it on the 'net yet. (EDIT: The trailer is available at Yahoo! Movies and it looks REALLY COOL!!!)
I'm sure this film is going to a billion dollars this weekend (I'm exaggerating). And I'm sure lots of people are going to disagree with me. I know both Justin and Phil told me today that they liked it. So, I'm sure Jason will too - since we never ever agree on films. I did get to see the "Transformers" trailer again, so that made me happy - that's the next film I am DYING to see. I am SO PUMPED UP for that film!!!
Friday, May 04, 2007
"Spider-Man 3" Quickly
Best action of the three films.
An okay storyline.
Worst acting of the three films.
"Spider-Man 3" suffers from "Titanic"-Syndrome. BLOCKS. 10 minutes of action. 10 minutes of horrible drama. 15 minutes of action. 15 minutes of bad acting. There is no flow to the film, and there is no connection between the scenes. I'd love to watch a version of the film with all of the bad acting edited out. It would be like an hour long awesome action film.
They really tried to do too much. And while that aspect was annoying, it really wasn't the worst part of the film. The acting was just BAD, HORRIBLE.
Honestly, what was I thinking about during this film???
"I can't wait to see 'The Dark Knight', because I know Nolan knows how to blend action and drama and make a good film..."
Overall grade: B. (The amazing action sequences saved the film for me.)
An okay storyline.
Worst acting of the three films.
"Spider-Man 3" suffers from "Titanic"-Syndrome. BLOCKS. 10 minutes of action. 10 minutes of horrible drama. 15 minutes of action. 15 minutes of bad acting. There is no flow to the film, and there is no connection between the scenes. I'd love to watch a version of the film with all of the bad acting edited out. It would be like an hour long awesome action film.
They really tried to do too much. And while that aspect was annoying, it really wasn't the worst part of the film. The acting was just BAD, HORRIBLE.
Honestly, what was I thinking about during this film???
"I can't wait to see 'The Dark Knight', because I know Nolan knows how to blend action and drama and make a good film..."
Overall grade: B. (The amazing action sequences saved the film for me.)
Friday, April 27, 2007
"The Invisible" Talk
I'm not going to include any "spoilers" in this review, I might write another one after this weekend, and talk about specific things in the film.
What I am going to say is that I was disappointed.
Now, let me preface that by saying this: I did like the movie. I didn't love it, and I didn't think it was great. But, I did not hate the flick.
But, the flick IS NOT what the previews make it out to be. It IS NOT a mystery/thriller like I was expecting. And honestly, not a whole lot happens in the film. The entire story (and the ORIGINAL plot) is revealed in the trailer. It is OBVIOUS that they cut out an entire part of the storyline, as it is missing from the film, and nothing seems to happen.
There is no mystery, like the trailer eludes to.
From the beginning, you know what happens.
Then, they have characters make decisions that are so out of character that they don't make any sense for the storyline - but are needed. It's all in an effort to force the story to go somewhere.
And sadly, this film has the longest, most drawn-out ending since "Return of the King" it NEVER feels like its going to end. Slow, slow, slow, blah, blah, blah... I couldn't sit still.
Also, there were numerous times that lyrical music was used, instead of a score, and I thought it was horrible. It was like having 5 montages in a film. It really didn't work for me.
So, did I really like this film, like I thought I did at the beginning of this post?
Maybe I don't.
I can't think of too many positives about it. But, when it was over, I don't remember thinking it was a waste of my time (although I was thinking, "Thank God! It's FINALLY over!!!").
Hmmmm... I'm warning you: It IS NOT like the preview makes you think it is. It's not. So, don't expect that. I hope you enjoy it more than I apparently did.
What I am going to say is that I was disappointed.
Now, let me preface that by saying this: I did like the movie. I didn't love it, and I didn't think it was great. But, I did not hate the flick.
But, the flick IS NOT what the previews make it out to be. It IS NOT a mystery/thriller like I was expecting. And honestly, not a whole lot happens in the film. The entire story (and the ORIGINAL plot) is revealed in the trailer. It is OBVIOUS that they cut out an entire part of the storyline, as it is missing from the film, and nothing seems to happen.
There is no mystery, like the trailer eludes to.
From the beginning, you know what happens.
Then, they have characters make decisions that are so out of character that they don't make any sense for the storyline - but are needed. It's all in an effort to force the story to go somewhere.
And sadly, this film has the longest, most drawn-out ending since "Return of the King" it NEVER feels like its going to end. Slow, slow, slow, blah, blah, blah... I couldn't sit still.
Also, there were numerous times that lyrical music was used, instead of a score, and I thought it was horrible. It was like having 5 montages in a film. It really didn't work for me.
So, did I really like this film, like I thought I did at the beginning of this post?
Maybe I don't.
I can't think of too many positives about it. But, when it was over, I don't remember thinking it was a waste of my time (although I was thinking, "Thank God! It's FINALLY over!!!").
Hmmmm... I'm warning you: It IS NOT like the preview makes you think it is. It's not. So, don't expect that. I hope you enjoy it more than I apparently did.
Saturday, March 17, 2007
"TMNT" Quick
Yes, it's been a LONG night.
And I just got home.
But, I also just watched "Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles" tonight!!!
Yep, ONE WEEK EARLY!!!
It's pretty good.
I give it a "B+".
I'll write more tomorrow.
I had to take a nap before the film (that's what happens when you start movies at 2am), but I'm still dead tired. So, check back later for a detailed description of my thoughts on the film.
Good night.
And I just got home.
But, I also just watched "Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles" tonight!!!
Yep, ONE WEEK EARLY!!!
It's pretty good.
I give it a "B+".
I'll write more tomorrow.
I had to take a nap before the film (that's what happens when you start movies at 2am), but I'm still dead tired. So, check back later for a detailed description of my thoughts on the film.
Good night.
Monday, February 05, 2007
True to My Word
Thursday, February 01, 2007
"The Key"
Two filmmaking friends of mine have teamed up for a film titled "The Key" and they sure put together a fine piece of indie work. The script was written by Steve "Papaw" Pyatte, while it was directed by Jim Dougherty. Papaw also does some more acting in the film, and I have to say that I really enjoyed it. A while back I was sent the linnk to the trailer for the film, and I'll be honest - I was NOT impressed by the trailer. It caused a minor rift between Papaw and I, he took my comments a little harsher than intended, but we eventually got it all straightened out. I'm glad to say that the final film is much better than the trailer had me thinking it was going to be. I suggest everyone take a look at it, and then you might want to visit the sites I link to following the video, to learn more about these two guys.
Frankenstein 1931 Films.
Indie Sunts.
There's nothing I care about coming out this weekend, so I doubt I'll be going to any screenings tonight - which is cool, because I've actually got two other indie DVDs at home that I need to burn copies of and watch. One is a documentary. I've previously written a review on the film "Luke's Father and the Sled" - which I really enjoyed - and the guys who made the film provided me with a make-of documentary, which also shows them at the Lake County Film Festival. While at this film festival, they were introduced to a film called "Grodmin" and I've borrowed the DVD of it - because it's suppose to have the most twisted ending to any indie film ever made. And that's not just coming from my friends - that's coming from the internet. I've actually spoken to the director via emails, and he's going to send me the final version of the DVD when it is finished. For now, I have a copy (which I'm going to copy) of the festival version of the film. It turns out that they've come into some more money, and are remastering the film, for a final DVD release. I'm really in the mood to watch some indie film (although, I'm more in the mood to kick out somemore episodes of "24" tonight) so, maybe at some point I can get those watched and talk about them...
Frankenstein 1931 Films.
Indie Sunts.
There's nothing I care about coming out this weekend, so I doubt I'll be going to any screenings tonight - which is cool, because I've actually got two other indie DVDs at home that I need to burn copies of and watch. One is a documentary. I've previously written a review on the film "Luke's Father and the Sled" - which I really enjoyed - and the guys who made the film provided me with a make-of documentary, which also shows them at the Lake County Film Festival. While at this film festival, they were introduced to a film called "Grodmin" and I've borrowed the DVD of it - because it's suppose to have the most twisted ending to any indie film ever made. And that's not just coming from my friends - that's coming from the internet. I've actually spoken to the director via emails, and he's going to send me the final version of the DVD when it is finished. For now, I have a copy (which I'm going to copy) of the festival version of the film. It turns out that they've come into some more money, and are remastering the film, for a final DVD release. I'm really in the mood to watch some indie film (although, I'm more in the mood to kick out somemore episodes of "24" tonight) so, maybe at some point I can get those watched and talk about them...
Monday, January 29, 2007
"Catch and Release"
Sunday was a busy day.After getting home from Chicago, I watched the Iowa basketball team lose, watched a disc of "24" Season Three, watched the Pacers lose to the Pistons, then went out to catch a movie by myself.
I've been wanting to see "Catch and Release" for a good amount of time. I first heard about last summer, when Kevin Smith blogged about working on the film. Then, they screened it at Vulgarthon last year, and it got some good reviews. Finally, the trailer actually made it look like a good flick. These days, if I don't see something before it comes out - thanks to my awesome friends - then I generally never go to see it. I'm not a fan of watching films in crowded theatres - "Inland Empire" at the Music Box was NERVE-WRECKING, but I survived. Anyways, I was afraid if I didn't force myself to see the flick this weekend, then I never would. Finally, I convinced myself that on a cold Sunday night, the theatre would probably be close to empty. And I was right. Two couples, a single lady, and myself populated the theatre.
The film is pretty good. It takes some turns that I didn't expect from this type of genre, and it stayed away from most stereotypical plot devices that I did expect. So, it was a pleasant surprise on many levels. The dialogue was pretty good, and fairly funny. The story worked in a slow revealing type of fashion, however a couple of events felt a little too rushed. With a run time a little over 2 hours, it was odd for a flick to feel like it was forcing things to happen. But, a lot does happen in the film.
It was my kind of film. Now, it didn't hit on my same emotional level as "The Last Kiss" did, but it didn't need to. It still opened my mind, and forced me to think about and address things in my own life.
First, it reminded me that in love, we don't always get what we want. No matter how close we come, it can always be taken away. Also, when we have feelings for someone, more often than not, they do not return those feelings - which only hurts the heart. Love is an interesting thing, and the things we do for love, and because of love, might not always yield the greatest results. It shows how difficult it is to move on with your life. And I know I related to that - I'm still stuck at the apex of a hill, wanting to go forward and get as far away from this hill as I can, but then I think about the trip up the hill - and how much I enjoyed it. And it makes me want to go back down the hill, and climb it again - even though the hill just wants me long gone. Moving on is tough - well, at least for me. I can only hope that one day, someone comes along who helps me down the hill, and onto the next one. Because, I've lived. I've learned. And the next hill is going to be much easier, and more fun.
Second, it reminded me that life has to change. It's evolution. It's life. It's constantly moving and changing. People make decisions, and no matter how close of friends you are, they make the choices that are best for them. Things change. People change. It all changes. And to sit around and think that your perfect life, with friends, family, and everything else is always going to be around is a facade. It's a mirage. Life, overall, is a let down. And the highs are always ruined by the lows.
Third, it has confirmed in my mind that I don't mind kids. I think I'm not a fan of babies - but like a four year old, I think we would rock out together. The kid in the film is awesome. And while I've spent a good deal of my life living in fear of having a son, I think it would be a wicked good time. Someone who would want to hang out with me (because I'd be THE MORE WICKED COOL father) and someone to play with - because let's be honest, I'm still a kid at heart. Throwing the football. Playing catch. Shooting hockey pucks in the driveway. I can't do those things, if I don't mentally grow up and prepare myself for it. And now, I think I want it to happen. I'm still scared out of my mind about it - but I also see it as a lot of fun.
I guess I'm just finally hitting that point. I've lived a good and fun life. I've done a lot of things. And there's a natural progression to achieve. A place to arrive at. And begin 50 when my kids are in high school is NOT something I'm interested in. I want to be there for every sporting event, play, musical, whatever they decide to do with their lives.
Interesting how a flick about relationships and a kid can make you re-evaluate your entire life.
And after the film, while driving home, I was thinking about everything I've been writing about - and some things that I didn't write about - and I thought about my "promise" to Heidi, that I'll write a new script. And I think I've got the basis and beginnings of a new storyline, that I hope to develop. It's rough. It's going to need a lot of thought, love, and work - but I think in few weeks time, if I give it some serious time - I might be working on the next script. I don't know how I'm going to make it - I don't know who is going to help. I don't know how I'm going to come up with all of the money to pay my actors, but I'm going to start with the script. And I'm going to see what kinds of reactions I get.
Because, Heidi reminded me of one thing: I love to tell stories. With words. And with pictures. So, I should keep doing what I love...
Thursday, January 25, 2007
Intrepid, eh?
I often refer you my readers over to Peddie's Blog. And today, while reading it for myself, I noticed something "new" to me - I don't know how long he's done this, but I just noticed it today.
Peddie has given nicknames to most of the bloggers that has links to. There's "The Random Blogger", "The Sports Blogger", "The Baking Blogger", "The Weekend Blogger", etc...
Then, there's what he calls me: "Shane White - The Intrepid Blogger".
Now, I consider myself a very intelligent person, but I will admit when I have to look into something. Aside from knowing the automobile, I wasn't completely sure what "intrepid" meant, so I looked it up. And here's the definition I found (www.m-w.com):
"Characterized by resolute fearlessness, fortitude, and endurance."
Again, I came across a word I wasn't 100% sure of the meaning. So, I looked up "fortitude":
"Strength of mind that enables a person to encounter danger or bear pain or adversity with courage."
This statement is so true, in many ways that most of you don't know about. But, if you stick with reading this blog, in the future - you will understand.
I think I am going to have to take this as a compliment, I don't know if it was meant to be - but it's an interesting way to look at myself, and one that I wouldn't have done without having to look into the meaning of these words.
Peddie, if I ever get word "Intrepid" tattooed on my body - I want you to know it's going to be a direct result of you putting the word (and definition) into my mind.
I guess I'm just taken back by learning the definition. It's probably the only positive adjective anyone has ever used to describe me...
I was supposed to go check out "Smokin' Aces" tonight - a flick I've been pumped about all week. But, my buddies decided to watch "Epic Movie" first (a flick I have NO desire to see), and were going to be starting "Smokin' Aces" too late for me. Doesn't this suck? "Back in the day" I wouldn't care how late I had to stay up to watch a movie I wanted to see - but now, 8am comes REALLY EARLY!!! But, to have my nights and weekends off - I'm willing to deal with it. So, I'm going to be in Chicago all weekend - maybe I'll try to catch it while I'm there - if there's time.
The other film I really want to see this coming week is "Catch and Release". I hope to catch it soon. Here's the trailer:
Peddie has given nicknames to most of the bloggers that has links to. There's "The Random Blogger", "The Sports Blogger", "The Baking Blogger", "The Weekend Blogger", etc...
Then, there's what he calls me: "Shane White - The Intrepid Blogger".
Now, I consider myself a very intelligent person, but I will admit when I have to look into something. Aside from knowing the automobile, I wasn't completely sure what "intrepid" meant, so I looked it up. And here's the definition I found (www.m-w.com):
"Characterized by resolute fearlessness, fortitude, and endurance."
Again, I came across a word I wasn't 100% sure of the meaning. So, I looked up "fortitude":
"Strength of mind that enables a person to encounter danger or bear pain or adversity with courage."
This statement is so true, in many ways that most of you don't know about. But, if you stick with reading this blog, in the future - you will understand.
I think I am going to have to take this as a compliment, I don't know if it was meant to be - but it's an interesting way to look at myself, and one that I wouldn't have done without having to look into the meaning of these words.
Peddie, if I ever get word "Intrepid" tattooed on my body - I want you to know it's going to be a direct result of you putting the word (and definition) into my mind.
I guess I'm just taken back by learning the definition. It's probably the only positive adjective anyone has ever used to describe me...
I was supposed to go check out "Smokin' Aces" tonight - a flick I've been pumped about all week. But, my buddies decided to watch "Epic Movie" first (a flick I have NO desire to see), and were going to be starting "Smokin' Aces" too late for me. Doesn't this suck? "Back in the day" I wouldn't care how late I had to stay up to watch a movie I wanted to see - but now, 8am comes REALLY EARLY!!! But, to have my nights and weekends off - I'm willing to deal with it. So, I'm going to be in Chicago all weekend - maybe I'll try to catch it while I'm there - if there's time.
The other film I really want to see this coming week is "Catch and Release". I hope to catch it soon. Here's the trailer:
The Spot
The Spot is the new bar that has replaced P.S. O'Rourke's.
My first statement is a tough one: Everything that I never got out of O'Rourke's, I can get out of The Spot. I love Sloan and Flea to death, they are some important people in my life. But, they didn't want a sport bar - and I kind of always did. The Spot is very much a sports bar.
The Spot is very much a hybrid. It still feels like O'Rourke's, it still feels like home. It still feels like the bar that I have so many wonderful memories from. O'Rourke's is where I met Kristen. O'Rourke's is where I filmed a lot of scenes from various films of mine. O'Rourke's was were I was guaranteed to have a friend at. Sloan and Flea didn't care about having a hugely popular bar, they wanted a place for themselves and their friends to hang out, and they treated the regulars better than I've ever seen people treated. P.S. O'Rourke's was a Speakeasy, a Watering Hole, and place for friends to sit around and just talk. On the weekends, they made their money with live bands - which Sloan never really cared for, but needed the added revenue on the weekends. But, no matter what time of day, or what day, Sloan or Flea would be there, and the waitresses treated us like no one else ever did. It was a special place, and always will be - I've got so many wonderful memories from there.
But, it's in the past. It's gone. I can't have it again. But, the other day, when we learned The Spot had opened, my friends and I found time to go there and check it out. That time turned out to be tonight. And tonight, I learned something wonderful: A former waitress, Jamie, and her husband - along with two of their friends - are the new owners of the bar. And they have done an AMAZING job with the place.
It's brighter. It's not so dark anymore. There's a sports theme, with various mid-west team banners hanging all over the place. There are HD Plasma TVs all over the upstairs, and four HD projection screen TVs on the main level. There is even a private room with it's own HD TV. The biggest improvement is the bathrooms, which have been completely redone. They look nothing like before, and are BEYOND amazing!
As I was leaving the bathroom, it happened:
"SHANE!!!"
I was told that Jamie left before I got there, so I wasn't expecting it. But, it turns out that she was just sitting at the bar. She ran up and gave me a hung, and I spent the next 45 minutes talking to her and her husband and finding out all the details about how she/they got from the closing of O'Rourke's to opening the building as their own. It was an interesting story - and I am REALLY proud of Jamie. If you read this regularly, you know one of my life-long ambitions is to own my own sports bar. So, this will be the next best thing. Jamie introduced me to the entire staff, and introduced them to me. They are all really cool, and very much like the "family" that was lost when O'Rourke's closed. Also, one of the former waitresses (and former love of my life) is supposed to come back and start working there. So, it will be awesome to see her again.
They have removed a lot of the couches. Most of downstairs is all tables and chairs. They have done a lot of tile-work on the downstairs, as well as added the big screens. Upstairs has lots of brand new leather love seats, which are very comfortable. Tonight, the NFL Network was re-airing the Colts/Patriots game - in condensed format - so we watched that and talked about the game and the Super Bowl. There is a chance that we are going to end up having our Super Bowl Party at The Spot. We talked to Jamie about it, and she made some suggestions to us. So, we're going to see how everyone feels.
It's so cool. It's still got the vibe of O'Rourke's, but with a different feel. Jamie told me she felt the same way I did when the bar closed - that she was missing a part of her life - and that was part of her motivation to buy the building and get the place re-opened, but make it a little more hip and appealing than Sloan and Flea. So, it's a nifty hybrid. It's got the old vibe for people like me, combined with the new appealing sports bar theme.
I finally have somewhere that I feel comfortable going again. It feels like home again already.
I highly recommend it, if you're looking for a cool place in Castleton - and if you actually like sports.
Friday, January 12, 2007
"Primevil" SUCKS
Yeah, F.Y.I. - IT SUCKS!!! DO NOT SEE IT.
I thought "Lake Placid" was bad.
I thought "Anaconda" was bad.
Those two films are OSCAR-WORTHY compared to this.
I saw it for one reason: Dominic Purcell. He had his moments, but it was NOT worth sitting through. Orlando Jones has two good one-liners. And there is ONE "surprise" that I didn't see coming. Other than that, BAD, BAD, BAD. And I'm NOT being my typical critical self. I went in with NO expectations, and wish that I wouldn't have wasted my time.
I hadn't hung out with Justin and Phil since Christmas, so that was another reason I went. We had lots of laughs, but it was still a HORRIBLE flick.
Probably the WORST FILM I've seen in 2007. Granted, it's the ONLY film I've seen in 2007 - but that's BESIDES the point. At the end of the year, I'll guarantee it's in my BOTTOM FIVE.
Don't waste you time, you will regret it...
I thought "Lake Placid" was bad.
I thought "Anaconda" was bad.
Those two films are OSCAR-WORTHY compared to this.
I saw it for one reason: Dominic Purcell. He had his moments, but it was NOT worth sitting through. Orlando Jones has two good one-liners. And there is ONE "surprise" that I didn't see coming. Other than that, BAD, BAD, BAD. And I'm NOT being my typical critical self. I went in with NO expectations, and wish that I wouldn't have wasted my time.
I hadn't hung out with Justin and Phil since Christmas, so that was another reason I went. We had lots of laughs, but it was still a HORRIBLE flick.
Probably the WORST FILM I've seen in 2007. Granted, it's the ONLY film I've seen in 2007 - but that's BESIDES the point. At the end of the year, I'll guarantee it's in my BOTTOM FIVE.
Don't waste you time, you will regret it...
Wednesday, January 10, 2007
Inland Empire
Sibley and I have made plans to attend a special screening of "Inland Empire" (Official Site) in Chicago on the weekend of the 27th. David Lynch is distributing the film himself, and according to the website, he's going to be at the screening that night.
It's going to be an awesome trip, but it got better when my buddy Heidi found out I was coming into town, and sent me this, in an email:
"I'm totally down for it. At the very least, though, we TOTALLY have to hang out. So let's keep in touch about it. You can't come to my city and not hang out with me - that would be illegal."
It's always nice to have someone act like they actually WANT to hang out with you. As cool as the weekend was going to be, it's looking like it's going to be even more fun than I hoped for.
I'm REALLY getting excited about the trip. I LOVE Road Trips, hence my East Coast drive. We're spending the night in Chi-Town, so it should turn into a really fun 48 hours. I'm hoping to some more road trips this summer. I'm trying to talk Zach into hitting Rondeau in Canada again. I have a feeling that multiple Weekend-Get-A-Aways are in store for 2007. Maybe some more to go back to Chicago?
Also, related to Sibley, is THIS ARTICLE from the Indy Star. Sibley is supposed to be in charge of the IMAX, when it opens. CONGRATS, bro. You know I'll be hitting you up for IMAX tickets, right???
Monday, January 01, 2007
2006: A Year in Shane
So, here it is: 2007.
And with that, I've taken some time today to think back over the past 365 Days - the year that was 2006. It was interesting. Lots of ups. Lots of downs. Lots of stuff happened. And I'm taking the time to list (with some pictures) some of the Top Threes of 2006, in various categories. So, here's a recap of 2006 - from Shane's eyes and mind.
1. The Christmas Tree at Rockefeller Center in New York City.
One of the last places I got to visit this year, but also one of the best. A place I'd been dreaming about seeing for so long, and thanks to Letha and Jason, I finally got to see it. It sure was amazing.
2. The Pier at Santa Monica, at Sunset.
The family trip to Los Angeles back in March was an amazing trip, filled with lots of fun times, but the night we spent in Santa Monica, and saw the sun set over the ocean was just beautiful.
3. The Campground at Rondeau State Park in Canada.
Zach's Bachelor Party took Zach, Jason Romberg, and myself into the heart of Canada to spend four days in the woods. Camping is always an awesome time, and since we haven't made a trip to Brown County in a couple of years, this was an awesome time. Three guys in the woods, talking about life under the stars. It was such a great trip.
1. "The Last Kiss"
Probably the best film about relationships I've seen in a long time. So many different perspectives and concepts of love and relationships, you're sure to identify with one of them. Perfect flick.
2. "The Prestige"
Probably the best storytelling of any film I've ever seen. Non-linear editing results in so many questions before answers, and allows three different time lines to intertwine with each other. This film also has THE BEST ENDING of any film since 1999 - PERIOD.
3. "Thank You For Smoking"
Just a flat-out hilarious film, that is wonderfully written and acted. Yes, some scenes are a little outlandish, but overall I think it's a wonderfully fun time, and Aaron Eckhart does an amazing job.
1. "Commit This to Memory" by The Motion City Soundtrack.
2. "Let Love In" by The Goo Goo Dolls.
3. "How to Save a Life" by The Fray.
2. "Lips of an Angel" by Hinder (from "Extreme Behavior")
3. "Feel the Silence" by The Goo Goo Dolls (from "Let Love In")
2. Pearl Jam
3. The Goo Goo Dolls
2. The Eastsiders Basketball Team winning the ISSA Class B Championship.
3. Big Al Harrington returning to the Indiana Pacers.
2. "Prison Break"
3. "How I Met Your Mother"
Yeah, this one takes the cake. One year ago today - I never would have seen it coming. I knew we were having problems, but I honestly believe some separation and time apart would help us figure out our feelings for each other. I guess she figured out her feelings - which wasn't a good thing for me, and it was a pretty big shocker when I got the paperwork in the mail.
2. Jason Moving.
When Jason and I were into film together, the guy told me he didn't think he would ever move to Los Angeles, because he didn't want to leave his family and friends in Indianapolis. So, when he was presented with the opportunity to move to Boston, I was first surprised that he was thinking about it - and more surprised with his final decision. I can still remember the night he told Annette and I that he was going to stay here in Indy, and turn the job down. It wasn't more than two hours later I was hanging out with him, when he told me he was going to take the job. I quickly went from "happy Jason was staying" to "bummed Jason was leaving". Another surprise to my life in 2006.
3. Dad Goes to Iraq.
I never would have imagined, until I was told, that my Dad would be going to Iraq. He's not exactly a 20-year-old infantryman. So, the government sending him over to Iraq to do some work was Out of Left Field, in my opinion. Luckily, he went and made it home safe - but it was still kind of a surprise to find out he was going.
I'm hoping for a good 2007.
I've got some life plans in order, and hope they work out.
I'm holding off on going back to school - so that I can spend the next few months getting my living arrangements worked out (finding an apartment downtown) and getting a new job. I plan to start talking to a counselor at IUPUI in the next few weeks, so that they can start setting me up and enrolling me in the classes I want to take in the fall. This will also give me a chance to save some money and start applying for financial aid.
I've only made one resolution for 2007.
And I think I'll be able to keep it. I've already started on it, and I think I can keep up with it. My resolution for 2007 is to get myself into better shape (which includes losing some weight). I've been riding 10 Miles a Day on the bike for five days a week, for the past three weeks - so I just need to keep that up. I've been lifting free weights and just need to continue doing that as well. Finally, no more soda. Juice, Water, Gatorade, Powerade, anything but soda. By the Spring, I want to be regularly running the canal downtown (hopefully living close enough to jog to the canal, and then jog the whole thing).
Well, 2006 sure changed my life.
Lots of ups.
Lots of downs.
Lots of good times.
Lots of lonely nights.
Somehow, I have a feeling 2007 is going to be a lot of the same...
...but I guess that's life.
I'll see you again in 365 Days, with another list. I hope you all have a WONDERFUL 2007.
And with that, I've taken some time today to think back over the past 365 Days - the year that was 2006. It was interesting. Lots of ups. Lots of downs. Lots of stuff happened. And I'm taking the time to list (with some pictures) some of the Top Threes of 2006, in various categories. So, here's a recap of 2006 - from Shane's eyes and mind.
Top Three Places I Visited in 2006
1. The Christmas Tree at Rockefeller Center in New York City.One of the last places I got to visit this year, but also one of the best. A place I'd been dreaming about seeing for so long, and thanks to Letha and Jason, I finally got to see it. It sure was amazing.
2. The Pier at Santa Monica, at Sunset.The family trip to Los Angeles back in March was an amazing trip, filled with lots of fun times, but the night we spent in Santa Monica, and saw the sun set over the ocean was just beautiful.
3. The Campground at Rondeau State Park in Canada.Zach's Bachelor Party took Zach, Jason Romberg, and myself into the heart of Canada to spend four days in the woods. Camping is always an awesome time, and since we haven't made a trip to Brown County in a couple of years, this was an awesome time. Three guys in the woods, talking about life under the stars. It was such a great trip.
Top Three Films I Saw in 2006
1. "The Last Kiss"Probably the best film about relationships I've seen in a long time. So many different perspectives and concepts of love and relationships, you're sure to identify with one of them. Perfect flick.
2. "The Prestige"
Probably the best storytelling of any film I've ever seen. Non-linear editing results in so many questions before answers, and allows three different time lines to intertwine with each other. This film also has THE BEST ENDING of any film since 1999 - PERIOD.
3. "Thank You For Smoking"
Just a flat-out hilarious film, that is wonderfully written and acted. Yes, some scenes are a little outlandish, but overall I think it's a wonderfully fun time, and Aaron Eckhart does an amazing job.
Top Three Albums I Bought in 2006
1. "Commit This to Memory" by The Motion City Soundtrack.2. "Let Love In" by The Goo Goo Dolls.
3. "How to Save a Life" by The Fray.
All great rockin' albums, which I still constantly listen to.
Top Three Singles Released in 2006
1. "Chasing Cars" by Snow Patrol (from "Eyes Open")2. "Lips of an Angel" by Hinder (from "Extreme Behavior")
3. "Feel the Silence" by The Goo Goo Dolls (from "Let Love In")
Top Three Concerts I Went to in 2006
1. The Trans-Siberian Orchestra2. Pearl Jam
3. The Goo Goo Dolls
Top Three Sports Moments in 2006
1. Reggie Miller's Jersey being retired.2. The Eastsiders Basketball Team winning the ISSA Class B Championship.
3. Big Al Harrington returning to the Indiana Pacers.
Top Three T.V. Shows I Watched in 2006
1. "Lost"2. "Prison Break"
3. "How I Met Your Mother"
Three Biggest Surprises of 2006
1. The Divorce.Yeah, this one takes the cake. One year ago today - I never would have seen it coming. I knew we were having problems, but I honestly believe some separation and time apart would help us figure out our feelings for each other. I guess she figured out her feelings - which wasn't a good thing for me, and it was a pretty big shocker when I got the paperwork in the mail.
2. Jason Moving.
When Jason and I were into film together, the guy told me he didn't think he would ever move to Los Angeles, because he didn't want to leave his family and friends in Indianapolis. So, when he was presented with the opportunity to move to Boston, I was first surprised that he was thinking about it - and more surprised with his final decision. I can still remember the night he told Annette and I that he was going to stay here in Indy, and turn the job down. It wasn't more than two hours later I was hanging out with him, when he told me he was going to take the job. I quickly went from "happy Jason was staying" to "bummed Jason was leaving". Another surprise to my life in 2006.
3. Dad Goes to Iraq.
I never would have imagined, until I was told, that my Dad would be going to Iraq. He's not exactly a 20-year-old infantryman. So, the government sending him over to Iraq to do some work was Out of Left Field, in my opinion. Luckily, he went and made it home safe - but it was still kind of a surprise to find out he was going.
I'm hoping for a good 2007.
I've got some life plans in order, and hope they work out.
I'm holding off on going back to school - so that I can spend the next few months getting my living arrangements worked out (finding an apartment downtown) and getting a new job. I plan to start talking to a counselor at IUPUI in the next few weeks, so that they can start setting me up and enrolling me in the classes I want to take in the fall. This will also give me a chance to save some money and start applying for financial aid.
I've only made one resolution for 2007.
And I think I'll be able to keep it. I've already started on it, and I think I can keep up with it. My resolution for 2007 is to get myself into better shape (which includes losing some weight). I've been riding 10 Miles a Day on the bike for five days a week, for the past three weeks - so I just need to keep that up. I've been lifting free weights and just need to continue doing that as well. Finally, no more soda. Juice, Water, Gatorade, Powerade, anything but soda. By the Spring, I want to be regularly running the canal downtown (hopefully living close enough to jog to the canal, and then jog the whole thing).
Well, 2006 sure changed my life.
Lots of ups.
Lots of downs.
Lots of good times.
Lots of lonely nights.
Somehow, I have a feeling 2007 is going to be a lot of the same...
...but I guess that's life.
I'll see you again in 365 Days, with another list. I hope you all have a WONDERFUL 2007.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)